On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:26:22PM +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > maybe bundling the warning suppression to the same patchset was not the > best of ideas. Jaroslav is correct the warnings can unfortunately create > real confusion as this is on a code path we run on every rt-resume, and if > you happen to have a system with FW that has some custom IPC types, you'll > get this warning constantly in dmesg. No, and especially putting it at the end of the series - presumably it has dependencies on the rest of it? You should always put fixes first in a series.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
