> > Was this patch shared on the mailing list? I don't see it in my inbox and in the > archives? > > At any rate, I am not hot on adding yet another machine driver just to change > an amplifier version. It's really horrible to maintain all of these permutations > by code duplication. > > Adding a variant in a existing machine driver is a much better idea, and pretty > much all new machine drivers follow this model. You could either rename the > existing driver as cml_rt101x_rt5682 or use sof_rt5682. > > Thanks > -Pierre + Jimmy from google Hi Jimmy, Any opinion about CML machine drivers for Chromebooks? We may keep the separated driver in CHROMIUM or modify existing Helios driver to adopt the architecture in sof_rt5682 to work with multiple amps. Regards, Brent
