On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 20:26 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:09:09PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 10:33 PM > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 10:18:07AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart > > > wrote: > > > > Thanks for the review Leon. > > > > > > > > > > Add support for the Ancillary Bus, ancillary_device and > > > > > > ancillary_driver. > > > > > > It enables drivers to create an ancillary_device and bind > > > > > > an > > > > > > ancillary_driver to it. > > > > > > > > > > I was under impression that this name is going to be changed. > > > > > > > > It's part of the opens stated in the cover letter. > > > > > > ok, so what are the variants? > > > system bus (sysbus), sbsystem bus (subbus), crossbus ? > > Since the intended use of this bus is to > > (a) create sub devices that represent 'functional separation' and > > (b) second use case for subfunctions from a pci device, > > > > I proposed below names in v1 of this patchset. > > > > (a) subdev_bus > > It sounds good, just can we avoid "_" in the name and call it subdev? > > > (b) subfunction_bus While we're still discussing names, may I also suggest simply "software bus" instead? Thanks,Ranjani
