On 12-01-08 16:21, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Ah, sorry. It was a different thread. Look for a mail with the subject > "PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path" in the LKML och > linux-pm archives. Right, and I see that the removal of start/stop is already in -mm. That's not going to work. Something (such as removing power) disabled Ondrej's CS4236 and the pnp_start_dev() is needed to re-enable it upon resume. >> But we certainly need the pnp_start_dev() in the current flow of >> things. It not being called is the problem this fixes... > > I think the previous suggestion was that the drivers should call this, > not the core, so that it behaved more like other parts of the kernel > (e.g. PCI). It seems all PnP drivers would need to stick a pnp_start_dev in their resume method then which means it really belongs in core. One important point where PnP and PCI differ is that PnP allows to change the resources on a protocol level and I don't see how it could ever not be necessary to restore the state a user may have set if power has been removed. Hibernate is just that, isn't it? Rene. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
