On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > On 22/09/2020 12:08, Mark Brown wrote: > I agree with you on this and I see the point, but Rob had a very different > opinion about the reg-names bindings to start with. > This topic been discussed in the past with Rob in many instances ex: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_Jsq+MMunmVWqeW9v2RyzsMKP+=kMzeTHNMG4JDHM7Fy0HBg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > According to him, reg-names seems to be highly discouraged as it came along > for the OMAP folks and was related to the hwmods stuff. That's very much specific to reg, it's not true of the use of names in general - Rob mentions cases like interrupts for example.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
