On 18-09-20, 08:54, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > On 9/18/20 7:05 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 17-09-20, 11:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Currently Slave devices are only added on startup, either from Device > > > Tree or ACPI entries. However Slave devices that are physically > > > present on the bus, but not described in platform firmware, will never > > > be added to the device list. The user/integrator can only know the > > > list of devices by looking a dynamic debug logs. > > > > > > This patch suggests adding a Slave device eveb there is no matching DT or > > > ACPI entry, so that we can see this in sysfs entry. > > > > > > Initial code from Srinivas. Comments, fixes for ACPI probe and edits > > > of commit message by Pierre. > > > > You should add yours as Co-developed. That is the standard tag for these > > things > > ok, I've never used this tag before but it seems appropriate indeed, thanks > for the suggestion. > > Should I add your Co-developed tag to the second patch as well then? Sure -- ~Vinod
