On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:28:54PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:52:03AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > > David Gibson wrote: > > > > Ok, but couldn't you strucutre your I2S or fabric driver so that it > > > only becomes fully operational once the codec driver has registered > > > with it? > > > Not in ASoC V1. You have to understand, ASoC V1 was designed without any > > consideration for runtime-bindings and other OF goodies. All connections > > between the drivers are static, literally. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if > > some ASoC drivers cannot be compiled as modules. > > I'd just like to emphasise this point - ASoC v1 really doesn't > understand the idea that the components of the sound subsystem might be > probed separately. It's set up to handle bare hardware with everything > being probed from code in the machine/fabric driver. This makes life > very messy for platforms with something like the device tree. > > As has been said, handling this properly is one of the major motivations > behind ASoC v2. Ick. Ok. Nonetheless, messing up the device tree to workaround ASoC V1's silly limitations is not a good idea. The device tree must represent the hardware as much as possible. If that means we have to have a bunch of platform-specific hacks to instatiate the drivers in the correct order / combination, that's unfortunate, but there you go. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel