Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] topology: use inclusive language for bclk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/8/20 9:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:39:13AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

-	__u8 bclk_master;	/* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */
+	__u8 bclk_provider;	/* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */

Is it 100% compatible?  Note that the uapi/* header is a copy from the
kernel header, and it means that we'll change the same for the kernel,
too.

It's absolutely 100% compatible by design.
I was planning to update the kernel uapi header to align changes, but the
volume of code is much lower on the alsa-lib side. Will resubmit with the
preferred provider/consumer wording.

It's binary compatible but it'd break the build for any existing code
using the UAPI headers.

Sorry, I don't fully get the comment. Aren't the uapi headers copied into each software tree that relies on them?



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux