On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 09:30:37AM +0530, Akshu Agrawal wrote: > When adding parent clk(mclk) to wclk, this adds fallback option > for the case where global clk name is used. > @@ -2780,6 +2780,7 @@ static int rt5682_register_dai_clks(struct snd_soc_component *component) > if (rt5682->mclk) { > init.parent_data = &(struct clk_parent_data){ > .fw_name = "mclk", > + .name = __clk_get_name(rt5682->mclk), > }; > init.num_parents = 1; > } I don't understand this change - we clearly already have the clock so why can't we just use whatever we used when we originally looked it up here?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature