Thanks for the quick response. This is great. I've tested the patch and confirmed that it works. On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, at 08:37, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > On 2020-09-01 5:23 PM, Liam Girdwood wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 13:33 +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > > ... > > >> > >> Hello Christian, > >> > >> Thank you for report! Issue is a known one to us and has already > >> been > >> addressed by: > >> > >> [PATCH v4 00/13] ASoC: Intel: Catpt - Lynx and Wildcat point > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg113762.html > >> > >> waiting for final dependency to be merged (Andy's resource-API > >> changes, > >> as Mark already added the SPI ones) so v5 with review changes can be > >> provided. Shouldn't be long before this gets merged. As consequence, > >> /haswell/ ceases to exist. > >> > > > > Please also don't forget that the new BDW HW register programming flows > > need to be shared as common code with the SOF BDW driver. > > > > Thanks > > > > Liam > > > > I don't believe this is related to Christian's report. > > Anyway, revert-patch for sound/soc/intel/haswell/ solution has been > provided so it can be later propagated to v5.8 and v5.9 -stable with > matching upstream commit's sha-id. > > Czarek >
