Re: [PATCH] ASoC drivers for the Freescale MPC8610 SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Brown wrote:

> Each individual call to set_sysclk() only takes three parameters but it
> can be called repeatedly and some configurations are going to require
> this. 

In other words, ...

clock1 = <0, bb8000>
clock2 = <1, 653230>
clock23 = <0, ab2372>

> and of course the ordering matters.  

Ok, you got me there.  But then, isn't this just another example where the 
device tree is incapable of describing a complex configuration, and so we need 
a platform driver?


> Indeed.  Providing the device tree stuff doesn't get set in stone I'm
> not sure we need to nail this down perfectly for ASoC v1 when we're
> running into trouble working around it.

I definitely agree with that.  I'll be the first to admit that this driver, 
much like ASoC V1, is a prototype.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux