Grant Likely wrote: > On 1/3/08, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Grant Likely wrote: >> >>> Why not be a child of the i2c bus with a phandle to the ssi bus? >> Because when I probe the SSI node, I want to know what the attached codec is. >> So if anything, I would need a pointer from the SSI bus *to* the respective >> child on the I2C bus. > > That's fine too (it's what is done with Ethernet PHYs). My preference > is the other way around, but it's not a big issue in this case. I'd just link in both directions, and let software follow it in whichever direction it prefers. -Scott _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
