Matt, Alexandre, Gentle ping. As this should be fixed in v5.9, a quick reply would be really appreciated. Otherwise I'll have to bundle the rapidio fix with the DPSUB fix, and get them both merged through the DRM/KMS tree without your ack. On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 01:52:04AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:14:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 31-07-20, 23:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > > > > > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > > > > > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > > > > > dependencies: > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > > > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > > > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > > > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > > > > > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > > > > > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > > > > > > > > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > > > > > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > > > > > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > > > > > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > > > > > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > > > > > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > > > > > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. > > > > > > > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could > > > you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ? > > > > Dmaengine? I see three patches none of which touch dmaengine.. > > Did I miss something? > > I'm not sure what I was thinking... It's the rapidio patch that needs to > be merged. > > Matt, Alexandre, can you either merge the patch as a v5.9 fix, or give > me an ack to get it merged through the DRM tree ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
