On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 1:20 AM Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +static int mt6359_platform_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[snip]
> +
> + return devm_snd_soc_register_component(&pdev->dev,
> + &mt6359_soc_component_driver,
> + mt6359_dai_driver,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(mt6359_dai_driver));
> +}
> +
> +static int mt6359_platform_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct mt6359_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s(), dev name %s\n",
> + __func__, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable(priv->avdd_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s(), failed to disable regulator!\n",
> + __func__);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + snd_soc_unregister_component(&pdev->dev);
You don't need to unregister the component which is already delegated to devm.
