On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:11:43PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On some platform(.e.g. i.MX8QM MEK), the "extal" clock is different
> with the mclk of codec, then the clock rate is also different.
> So it is better to get clock rate of "extal" rate by clk_get_rate,
> don't reuse the clock rate of mclk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> changes in v2
> - add defer probe handler
>
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> index 52adedc03245..32f8f756e6bb 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> @@ -696,6 +696,17 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto asrc_fail;
> }
> } else if (of_node_name_eq(cpu_np, "esai")) {
> + struct clk *esai_clk = clk_get(&cpu_pdev->dev, "extal");
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(esai_clk)) {
> + priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
> + priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
Will it break existing imx-audio-cs42888 on older i.MX platforms?
'cause it overwrites cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[] that are set in "card
configurations" section.
