On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 08:26:13PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 7:16 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why is this a good fix, as opposed to only skipping the set_bias_level() > > bit? > Did you mean: skip to call snd_soc_dapm_set_bias_level() in > dapm_pre_sequence_async() and dapm_post_sequence_async()? No, I mean why not just add the missing puts which are currently being skipped due to being caught up with the bias level changes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
