Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: haswell: Power transition refactor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:34 AM Cezary Rojewski
<cezary.rojewski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-19 3:21 AM, Curtis Malainey wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:19 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>
> > We reverted this patch locally due to regressions and raised the issue
> > with Cezary on Github, we got no response.
> >
> > Curtis
> >> 8ec7d6043263ecf250b9b7c0dd8ade899487538a is the first bad commit
> >> commit 8ec7d6043263ecf250b9b7c0dd8ade899487538a
> >> Author: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date:   Mon Mar 30 21:45:20 2020 +0200
> >>
> >>       ASoC: Intel: haswell: Power transition refactor
> >>
>
> Hello,
>
> This is the very first time I see hear about the issue. You raised no
> issue Curtis, instead, you did write a comment mentioning me in Closed
> thread thesofproject/linux which isn't even the driver issue relates to.
That thread was directed to getting that fixed, you were active on the
thread, regardless of whether the repo is or not. The bugs fell past
their SLOs that were sent to your team through issue trackers which
meant your team was not responding.
>
> If you scroll up a bit, in the very same thread there is a message
> notifying about official path for such issues. Said message was ack'ed
> by management before posting and that's why it's split from technical
> explanation.
And if you scroll down you see this comment from Ross
https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/1842#issuecomment-606232124
We both attended meetings with your team where this request was
ignored. It took you only a couple of days to fix once we took this
approach yet it sat in the backlog for months. Forgive me if I have
little faith in your "official path." This was a major blocker for us
and it sat untouched.
>
> We've received no response from Harsha and Cedrik about the issue being
> risen. Official HSD-ticket is left unchanged since my feedback from 3rd
> April.
When someone tags you in a comment it is your job to read it as a
Github developer, regardless of the status of the thread.
>
> Help me help you - don't wait until problem escalates. Adhere to
> official protocols, notify early and stay in contact. Last time when
> your 'SOF github-IntelSST BDW' ticket finally did arrive at my desk, I
> drove back to campus, borrowed the only SAMUS we have and by the end of
> the week, the problem was fixed. Monday Mar30 you had the official
> response and patches applied.
Yes, after months of trying to get this fixed through the "official
path" and failing. Don't let the issue escalate outside the trackers
in the first place. Be active and respond to high priority requests. I
still have yet to see a response from intel regarding a solution on
any of the bugs regarding this issue. Our PM pinged Carol many times
during the course of getting this fixed with no response. I don't see
why I should post there when posting here clearly got a quicker
response. In fact your are actually CCed on the bug where the revert
was posted and you didn't even respond. Don't feed me lines.
>
> I've forwarded your issue to required entities within Intel so issue is
> tracked appropriately.
>
> Regards,
> Czarek



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux