Re: [PATCH] ANDROID: sound: usb: Add vendor's hooking interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/16/20 9:18 PM, JaeHun Jung wrote:
In mobile, a co-processor is used when using USB audio
to improve power consumption.
hooking is required for sync-up when operating
the co-processor. So register call-back function.
The main operation of the call-back function is as follows:
- Initialize the co-processor by transmitting data
   when initializing.
- Change the co-processor setting value through
   the interface function.
- Configure sampling rate
- pcm open/close

Thank you for this patch. With the removal of the 3.5mm jack on a number of platforms, and improvements to reduce power consumption on a variety of hosts there's indeed a need to enhance sound/usb in the kernel.


Bug: 156315379

Change-Id: I32e1dd408e64aaef68ee06c480c4b4d4c95546dc
Signed-off-by: JaeHun Jung <jh0801.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx>

You probably want to remove bug references and Change-Id if they are not publicly visible

@@ -891,6 +897,15 @@ static int snd_usb_pcm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
  	struct usb_interface *iface;
  	int ret;
+ if (usb_audio_ops && usb_audio_ops->vendor_set_pcmbuf) {
+		ret = usb_audio_ops->vendor_set_pcmbuf(subs->dev);
+
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(&subs->dev->dev, "pcm buf transfer failed\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
  	if (! subs->cur_audiofmt) {
  		dev_err(&subs->dev->dev, "no format is specified!\n");
  		return -ENXIO;
@@ -924,6 +939,15 @@ static int snd_usb_pcm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
  		if (ret < 0)
  			goto unlock;
+ if (usb_audio_ops && usb_audio_ops->vendor_set_rate) {
+			subs->need_setup_ep = false;
+			usb_audio_ops->vendor_set_rate(
+					subs->cur_audiofmt->iface,
+					subs->cur_rate,
+					subs->cur_audiofmt->altsetting);
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+
  		ret = configure_endpoint(subs);
  		if (ret < 0)
  			goto unlock;
@@ -1333,6 +1357,9 @@ static int snd_usb_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
  	struct snd_usb_substream *subs = &as->substream[direction];
  	int ret;
+ if (usb_audio_ops && usb_audio_ops->vendor_pcm_con)
+		usb_audio_ops->vendor_pcm_con(true, direction);
+
  	subs->interface = -1;
  	subs->altset_idx = 0;
  	runtime->hw = snd_usb_hardware;
@@ -1361,12 +1388,18 @@ static int snd_usb_pcm_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
  	struct snd_usb_substream *subs = &as->substream[direction];
  	int ret;
+ if (usb_audio_ops && usb_audio_ops->vendor_pcm_con)
+		usb_audio_ops->vendor_pcm_con(false, direction);
+

can you elaborate on the PCM streaming parts? if you allocate a buffer for the co-processor to deal with PCM data, will you end-up copying data from the existing ring buffers allocated with vmalloc() into your coprocessor?

I was instead thinking of having a different 'mode' where the PCM buffers are not allocated by sound/usb, but instead allocated by the driver taking care of the low-power USB path, so that apps can directly write into ring buffers that are handled by the coprocessor/offload unit.

Thanks
-Pierre



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux