On 30-11-07 17:27, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:07:27 +0100, > Rene Herman wrote: >> By the way, eventually I'd in fact probably like to move some of the drivers >> that now still support legacy ISA over to PnP only. After all, chips such as >> the CMI8330, CS4232+, ES1869+ and OPL3SA2 _are_ PnP only chips. >> >> Certainly for CS4232+ and ES1869+ that can't be done currently as we know >> people are in fact using isapnp=0 to work around PnPBIOS issues but from the >> previous report there it seemed that might actually just consist of the BIOS >> claiming no resource change is possible, which pnp_activate_dev (through >> pnp_autoconfig_dev) insist on anyway. This would be something to fix inside >> PnP instead... > > Well, I'm not sure about that. Certainly there are some users that > use isapnp=no with explicit parameters. Yes, currently, but as said, we might be able to al least make sure they don't _need_ to do that at the PnP layer after which it becomes somewhat debatable at least. But yes, sure, not now, once, maybe, perhaps, ... >> Anyways, here's just a further Documentation update. You once told me to >> start new threads for patches, but that seems clumsy now... :-| > > Thanks. It seems that people do care more on explanations about the > removal of options. Could you add that, too? > Just mention about sysfs as alternative way to change the > parameters... Yes. Documentation/pnp.txt wants to be a little more verbose after which ALSA documentation can refer to it. I'll cook something up... Rene. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
