Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: max98390: Added Amplifier Driver

[Steve Lee <steves.lee.maxim@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:16 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> (The patch passed 2 round review in https://crrev.com/c/2083354)
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 4:23 PM Steve Lee <steves.lee.maxim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +static int max98390_dai_set_fmt(struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai, unsigned int fmt)
> > +{
> > +       struct snd_soc_component *component = codec_dai->component;
> > +       struct max98390_priv *max98390 =
> > +               snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
> > +       unsigned int mode;
> > +       unsigned int format;
> > +       unsigned int invert;
> > +
> > +       dev_dbg(component->dev, "%s: fmt 0x%08X\n", __func__, fmt);
> > +
> > +       switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_MASTER_MASK) {
> > +       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS:
> > +               mode = MAX98390_PCM_MASTER_MODE_SLAVE;
> > +               break;
> > +       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFM:
> > +               max98390->master = true;
> > +               mode = MAX98390_PCM_MASTER_MODE_MASTER;
> > +               break;
> > +       default:
> > +               dev_err(component->dev, "DAI clock mode unsupported\n");
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       regmap_update_bits(max98390->regmap,
> > +               MAX98390_PCM_MASTER_MODE,
> > +               MAX98390_PCM_MASTER_MODE_MASK,
> > +               mode);
> > +
> > +       switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_INV_MASK) {
> > +       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_NB_NF:
> > +               break;
> > +       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_IB_NF:
> > +               invert = MAX98390_PCM_MODE_CFG_PCM_BCLKEDGE;
> > +               break;
> > +       default:
> > +               dev_err(component->dev, "DAI invert mode unsupported\n");
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       regmap_update_bits(max98390->regmap,
> > +               MAX98390_PCM_MODE_CFG,
> > +               MAX98390_PCM_MODE_CFG_PCM_BCLKEDGE,
> > +               invert);
> invert will be uninitialized in the SND_SOC_DAIFMT_NB_NF case.
Thank you for feedback.
I've add initial value for invert.
>
> > +static int max98390_dai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> > +               struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
> > +       struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> Lack of 1 tab indent.
Done as requested.
>
> > +static int max98390_adaptive_rdc_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > +               struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > +{
> > +       int rdc, rdc0;
> > +       struct snd_soc_component *component =
> > +               snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
> > +       struct max98390_priv *max98390 =
> > +               snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
> > +
> > +       regmap_read(max98390->regmap, THERMAL_RDC_RD_BACK_BYTE1, &rdc);
> > +       regmap_read(max98390->regmap, THERMAL_RDC_RD_BACK_BYTE0, &rdc0);
> > +       rdc0 |= rdc << 8;
> > +       ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = rdc0;
> ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = rdc0 | (rdc << 8);
Done as requested.
>
> > +static int max98390_dsm_init(struct snd_soc_component *component)
> > +{
> > +       int ret;
> > +       const char *filename;
> > +       struct max98390_priv *max98390 =
> > +               snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
> > +       const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
> > +       char *dsm_param = NULL;
> Don't need to initialize fw and dsm_param in the case.
Done as requested.
>
> > +
> > +       filename = "dsm_param.bin";
> Either:
> - initialize when declaring the variable
> - remove the variable and inline into request_firmware() call
I've added initialized at declare.
>
> > +       ret = request_firmware(&fw, filename, component->dev);
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               dev_err(component->dev,
> > +                       "Failed to acquire dsm params: %d\n", ret);
> > +               goto err;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       dev_info(component->dev,
> > +               "max98390: param fw size %d\n",
> > +               fw->size);
> > +       dsm_param = (char *)fw->data;
> > +       dsm_param += MAX98390_DSM_PAYLOAD_OFFSET;
> > +       regmap_bulk_write(max98390->regmap, DSM_EQ_BQ1_B0_BYTE0,
> > +               dsm_param,
> > +               fw->size - MAX98390_DSM_PAYLOAD_OFFSET);
> > +       release_firmware(fw);
> > +       regmap_write(max98390->regmap, MAX98390_R23E1_DSP_GLOBAL_EN, 0x01);
> > +
> > +err:
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
>
> > +static int max98390_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
> > +{
> > +       struct max98390_priv *max98390 =
> > +               snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
> > +
> > +       /* Update dsm bin param */
> This comment makes more sense if before max98390_dsm_init().
Done as requested.
>
> > +       regmap_write(max98390->regmap, MAX98390_SOFTWARE_RESET, 0x01);
> > +       /* Sleep reset settle time */
> > +       msleep(20);
> > +       max98390_dsm_init(component);
>
> > +       /* Check Revision ID */
> > +       ret = regmap_read(max98390->regmap,
> > +               MAX98390_R24FF_REV_ID, &reg);
> > +       if (ret < 0) {
> if (ret)
Done as requested.