Hi Ranjani Thank you for feedback > > I think snd_soc_dai_activity() is correct, *so far*. > > > > Exceptions are > > soc-dapm.c :: snd_soc_dai_link_event_pre_pmu() > > soc-dapm.c :: snd_soc_dai_link_event() (snip) > > Can you agree below ? > > 1) use runtime_activate()/deactivate() at above functions. > I am wondering what the original intention for having separate > stream_active and active members for snd_soc_dai was. I'm not sure... > With your proposal there wouldnt be a need for "active" anymore, isnt it? Yeah, thus, my patch will remove it. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
