On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sun, 25.11.07 22:42, Jaroslav Kysela (perex@xxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > BTW, what's the status of the BTS? Takashi asked me to post all my > > > issues on the ML instead of on the BTS. So why have the BTS at all? > > > It's even linked on the alsa-project.org front page under "I found a > > > bug!", which is a bit misleading. If this Mantis thing is not liked at > > > all, would it be possible to make some replacement available? Maybe > > > just use the kernel bugzilla on bugzilla.kernel.org? It's very fast, > > > and certainly more fun to work with than with Mantis. > > > > I prefer BTS but Takashi not. It's matter of personal preference. Mantis > > is easy maintainable and we have more projects (or packages) not only > > drivers. > > The kernel bugzilla already is used for stuff like klibc and other > userspace support code for the kernel. I am sure noone would oppose to > move the complete bug tracking of ALSA to the kernel bz. But why to change to bugzilla? The basic functions of both BTSes are very similar (except the fact I don't like perl at all). Actually, ALSA services (server) run on a dedicated virtual XEN machine, so we can install any software we need. Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
