On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:13:28 +0100, > I wrote: > > > > > > > If not, then it is better to remove it/remame to VolumeKnob > > > > > > > > Agreed. I'd like to take a safer way if you don't insist... > > > Great, it is probably the best to have a virtual master volume. > > > Just one question, it will be probably enabled for devices that don't have a > > > master volume (or have it broken like the STAC), right?, > > > And when you expect it to be merged? > > > > Hopefully will be posted in this week after a small brush up. > > OK, here is a series of the patch I promised. > > The first one is the patch to add virtual master controls. > > === > > [PATCH] Add virtual master control > > This patch adds the routines to create virtual master controls. > A virtual master control can have multiple slave controls that > are supposed to be identical type. The master volume will add the > master attenuation and the master switch will add the master mute > switch. > > --- I'm really not sure if I like to see such extensions in kernel. We have now user control elements and a small daemon written in C or python will do exactly same job and will be more flexible. Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
