On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:01:44AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > That is not true for everyone, it is only true for Intel, pls call that > > > out as well... > > > > Why is it not true for everyone? How else do you get the pm stuff back > > to your hardware? > > The rest of the world would do using the real controller device. For > example the soundwire controller on Qualcomm devices is enumerated as a > DT device and is using these... > > If Intel had a standalone controller or enumerated as individual > functions, it would have been a PCI device and would manage as such If it is not a standalone controller, what exactly is it? I thought it was an acpi device, am I mistaken? What is the device that the proper soundwire controller driver binds to on an Intel-based system? thanks, greg k-h
