Re: [PATCH] ALSA: usb-audio: Apply async workaround for Scarlett 2i4 2nd gen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



В Чт, 23/04/2020 в 18:10 +0300, Alexander Tsoy пишет:
> В Чт, 23/04/2020 в 13:22 +0200, Takashi Iwai пишет:
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:22:36 +0200,
> > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 01:45:01 +0200,
> > > Alexander Tsoy wrote:
> > > > В Ср, 22/04/2020 в 22:28 +0200, Takashi Iwai пишет:
> > > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 21:26:23 +0200,
> > > > > Alexander Tsoy wrote:
> > > > > > В Ср, 22/04/2020 в 20:55 +0200, Gregor Pintar пишет:
> > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 Alexander Tsoy wrote:
> > > > > > > > В Вт, 21/04/2020 в 21:31 +0200, Takashi Iwai пишет:
> > > > > > > > > I wonder, though, whether we can correct the rounding
> > > > > > > > > error
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > driver code, too.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I'm not sure if it's possible with currently used
> > > > > > > > Q16.16
> > > > > > > > arithmetic.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Maybe calculate fixed correction shifts (like it would be
> > > > > > > feedback)?
> > > > > > > Something like leap year.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > In endpoint.c:
> > > > > > > static inline unsigned get_usb_high_speed_rate(unsigned
> > > > > > > int
> > > > > > > rate)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > 	return ((rate << 10) + 62) / 125;
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > I guess 62 tries to round it, but exact number is needed.
> > > > > > > So
> > > > > > > exact
> > > > > > > value for
> > > > > > > 44100 should be 361267.2. For 48000 it is 360448.
> > > > > > > If only we can deliver that 0.2 by shifting rate somehow?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > At least maybe it would be better to disable sample rates
> > > > > > > that do
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > divide
> > > > > > > by 1000 on SYNC playback endpoints, if there are others
> > > > > > > sample
> > > > > > > rates.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > But I'm not familar with the code or USB.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think instead of accumulating the fractional part of
> > > > > > fs/fps
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > Q16.16
> > > > > > format we should accumulating remainder of division fs/fps.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > So for 44100 Hz and High Speed USB the calculations would
> > > > > > be:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > fs = 44100
> > > > > > fps = 8000
> > > > > > rem = 44100 % 8000 = 4100
> > > > > > accum = 0
> > > > > > packet_size_min = 44100 / 8000 = 5
> > > > > > packet_size_max = 44100 + (8000 - 1) / 8000 = 6
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 1. accum += rem = 4100
> > > > > >    accum < fps => packet_size = packet_size_min = 5
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2. accum += rem = 8200
> > > > > >    accum >= fps => {
> > > > > >        packet_size = packet_size_max = 6
> > > > > >        accum -= fps = 200
> > > > > >    }
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 3. accum += rem = 4300
> > > > > >    accum < fps => packet_size = packet_size_min = 5
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 80. accum += rem = 8000
> > > > > >     accum >= fps => {
> > > > > >         packet_size = packet_size_max = 6
> > > > > >         accum -= fps = 0
> > > > > >     }
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yeah, something like that is what I had in my mind.
> > > > > It'd be greatly appreciated if someone can experiment it.
> > > > > Unfortunately I have no proper USB-audio device now at
> > > > > hands...
> > > > 
> > > > OK, here is a quick hacky patch, that seems to work for me:
> > > 
> > > Awesome, thanks!
> > > 
> > > The patch looks good enough.  A minor fix would be reset
> > > sample_accum
> > > at snd_usb_pcm_prepare().
> > 
> > It should be rather in snd_usb_endpoint_start().
> 
> Yes, indeed. Thanks!
> 
> > > If someone can test more and it shows the positive result, I'd
> > > happy
> > > take it.
> > 
> > ... and on the second thought, I wonder whether the new method can
> > be simply applied to all cases.  Your code gives basically more
> > accurate timing. 
> 
> I'm not sure. We are getting feedback data already in Q16.16 format
> so
> the current code seems pretty good for its task.
> 
> Some additional notes:
> - Locking inside snd_usb_endpoint_next_packet_size() is probably not
> needed. It is needed in snd_usb_endpoint_slave_next_packet_size()
> because snd_usb_handle_sync_urb() can modify ep->freqm. Or maybe I'm
> missing something?

And some further notes:

- I removed locking from snd_usb_endpoint_next_packet_size() and this
seems completely fixed an issue with large URBs I reported here:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199327#c28

So playing at 96 kHz, driver packs 48 frames per URB and no more audio
discontinuities.

- All remaining issues with MOTU Microbook IIc a fixed now. This device
is *extremely* sensitive to correctness of the input stream, and
previously at sample rates 44.1 and 88.2 it was periodically starting
playing some harsh noise or switching output to different channels.
Probably it performed reads from the buffer that were not aligned to
the frames boundary. Now this issue is completely gone.




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux