On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:02:08PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > On 17/04/2020 12:24, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > but IMO the FE DAIs are a negligible overhead compared to the routing > > matrix and the many BE DAIs that are really never going to be used > > (because nothing is physically connected to the ports). > Two things, one unnecessary mixers, second thing is we need to know how many > FE dais are in the system, which should be derived from the number of dai > child nodes. These can potentially be SoC specific or firmware specific. You shouldn't be worrying about unused mixers, ideally we'd be walking the DAPM graph and masking things - this isn't something that should be open coded at individual driver levels.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
