Hi. Takashi Iwai wrote: > Changing period_size isn't allowed arbitrarilly because it's a > hardware constraint. OTOH, avail_min is the software parameter. > So avail_min > period_size makes sense in some cases. > In my patch I disallowed the case avail_min < period_size because it > doesn't work *practically*. OK, I see, thank you. Now it seems the patch is still not applied. Just to make sure, is it because you are still waiting for the test-case, or just haven't got around to apply it yet? I am asking to make sure that I am not responsible for the delay. :) _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel