Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: SOF: initialise work immediately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:30:42PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:29:19PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Fix uninitialised work errors by moving initialisation to directly
> > after allocation.
> > 
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski (2):
> >   ASoC: SOF: (cosmetic) use for_each_pcm_streams() in sof_dai_load()
> >   ASoC: SOF: fix uninitialised "work" with VirtIO
> 
> As documented in submitting-patches.rst please send patches to the 
> maintainers for the code you would like to change.  The normal kernel
> workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't
> copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more
> difficult to apply patches.

I know that different maintainers have different preferences. For example 
in the subsysteem, where I'd worked for about 10 years the maintainer 
preferred not to be CCed on patches, he preferred to pick up patches from 
his mailing list folders, or whatever arrangement his mail filters 
provided for. I learned already that in ALSA / ASoC it's usual to CC 
maintainers. But I wasn't sure whether that also holds for larger patch 
series. E.g. my main patch series now consists of 14 patches, so, I 
thought, that maybe you would rather not receive multiple copies of the 
entire seriees for each new version both directly in your inbox and in 
the mailing list folder. Or is it indeed your preference to always be 
CCed on all patches? I apologise for re-iterating a question, that 
probably had been addressed multiple times before, maybe it's worth 
documenting this somewhere on ALSA web?

Thanks
Guennadi



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux