Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:19 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The new macro set has a consistent namespace and uses C99 initializers
>> instead of the grufty C89 ones.
>>
>> Rename the local macro wrapper to X86_MATCH for consistency. It stays for
>> readability sake.
>
>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT, NULL),
>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_AIRMONT, NULL),
>
>> -#define ICPU(model) { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, }
>> +#define X86_MATCH(model) X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(model, NULL)
>
> Maybe we can do a generic macro to avoid all these ', NULL' repetitions?
I opted for having the data argument everywhere to keep the macro maze
small. And we have enough places where data is actually used.
Thanks,
tglx
