On 11-03-20, 17:10, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> We want to make sure SHIM register fields such as SYNCPRD are only
> programmed once. Since we don't have a controller-level driver, we
> need master-level drivers to collaborate: the registers will only be
> programmed when the first link is powered-up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/intel.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/soundwire/sdw_intel.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.h b/drivers/soundwire/intel.h
> index 568c84a80d79..cfc83120b8f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.h
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> * @ops: Shim callback ops
> * @dev: device implementing hw_params and free callbacks
> * @shim_lock: mutex to handle access to shared SHIM registers
> + * @shim_mask: global pointer to check SHIM register initialization
> */
> struct sdw_intel_link_res {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ struct sdw_intel_link_res {
> const struct sdw_intel_ops *ops;
> struct device *dev;
> struct mutex *shim_lock; /* protect shared registers */
> + u32 *shim_mask;
You have a pointer, okay where is it initialized
> };
>
> #endif /* __SDW_INTEL_LOCAL_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_intel.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_intel.h
> index 979b41b5dcb4..120ffddc03d2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_intel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_intel.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct sdw_intel_slave_id {
> * links
> * @link_list: list to handle interrupts across all links
> * @shim_lock: mutex to handle concurrent rmw access to shared SHIM registers.
> + * @shim_mask: flags to track initialization of SHIM shared registers
> */
> struct sdw_intel_ctx {
> int count;
> @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ struct sdw_intel_ctx {
> struct sdw_intel_slave_id *ids;
> struct list_head link_list;
> struct mutex shim_lock; /* lock for access to shared SHIM registers */
> + u32 shim_mask;
And a integer, question: why do you need pointer and integer, why not
use only one..?
--
~Vinod
