Re: [PATCH 01/10] ASoC: soc-acpi: expand description of _ADR-based devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/12/2020 8:33 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
For SoundWire, we need to know if endpoints needs to be 'aggregated'
(MIPI parlance, meaning logically grouped), e.g. when two speaker
amplifiers need to be handled as a single logical output.

We don't necessarily have the information at the firmware (BIOS)
level, so add a notion of endpoints and specify if a device/endpoint
is part of a group, with a position.

This may be expanded in future solutions, for now only provide a group
and position information.

Since we modify the header file, change all existing upstream tables
as well to avoid breaking compilation/bisect.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/sound/soc-acpi.h                      | 39 ++++++--
  .../intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-cml-match.c   | 87 +++++++++++++----
  .../intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c   | 97 +++++++++++++++----
  .../intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-tgl-match.c   | 49 ++++++++--
  4 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)


(...)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c b/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c
index 752733013d54..36e2d09cf58c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c
@@ -33,55 +33,112 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_icl_machines[] = {
  };
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_acpi_intel_icl_machines);
-static const u64 rt700_0_adr[] = {
-	0x000010025D070000
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint single_endpoint = {
+	.num = 0,
+	.aggregated = 0,
+	.group_position = 0,
+	.group_id = 0,
+};
+
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint spk_l_endpoint = {
+	.num = 0,
+	.aggregated = 1,
+	.group_position = 0,
+	.group_id = 1,
+};
+
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint spk_r_endpoint = {
+	.num = 0,
+	.aggregated = 1,
+	.group_position = 1,
+	.group_id = 1,
+};
+
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt700_0_adr[] = {
+	{
+		.adr = 0x000010025D070000,
+		.num_endpoints = 1,
+		.endpoints = &single_endpoint,
+	}
  };
static const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr icl_rvp[] = {
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(0),
  		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt700_0_adr),
-		.adr = rt700_0_adr,
+		.adr_d = rt700_0_adr,
  	},
  	{}
  };
-static const u64 rt711_0_adr[] = {
-	0x000010025D071100
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt711_0_adr[] = {
+	{
+		.adr = 0x000010025D071100,
+		.num_endpoints = 1,
+		.endpoints = &single_endpoint,
+	}
+};
+
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_1_adr[] = {
+	{
+		.adr = 0x000110025D130800,
+		.num_endpoints = 1,
+		.endpoints = &single_endpoint,
+	}
  };
-static const u64 rt1308_1_adr[] = {
-	0x000110025D130800
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_2_adr[] = {
+	{
+		.adr = 0x000210025D130800,
+		.num_endpoints = 1,
+		.endpoints = &single_endpoint,
+	}
  };
-static const u64 rt1308_2_adr[] = {
-	0x000210025D130800
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_1_group1_adr[] = {
+	{
+		.adr = 0x000110025D130800,
+		.num_endpoints = 1,
+		.endpoints = &spk_l_endpoint,
+	}
  };
-static const u64 rt715_3_adr[] = {
-	0x000310025D071500
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_2_group1_adr[] = {
+	{
+		.adr = 0x000210025D130800,
+		.num_endpoints = 1,
+		.endpoints = &spk_r_endpoint,
+	}
+};
+
+static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt715_3_adr[] = {
+	{
+		.adr = 0x000310025D071500,
+		.num_endpoints = 1,
+		.endpoints = &single_endpoint,
+	}
  };
static const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr icl_3_in_1_default[] = {
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(0),
  		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt711_0_adr),
-		.adr = rt711_0_adr,
+		.adr_d = rt711_0_adr,
  	},
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(1),
-		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_1_adr),
-		.adr = rt1308_1_adr,
+		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_1_group1_adr),
+		.adr_d = rt1308_1_adr,

Is this right, you use different struct in ARRAY_SIZE and assignment?

  	},
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(2),
-		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_2_adr),
-		.adr = rt1308_2_adr,
+		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_2_group1_adr),
+		.adr_d = rt1308_2_adr,

Same here.

  	},
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(3),
  		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt715_3_adr),
-		.adr = rt715_3_adr,
+		.adr_d = rt715_3_adr,
  	},
  	{}
  };
@@ -90,17 +147,17 @@ static const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr icl_3_in_1_mono_amp[] = {
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(0),
  		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt711_0_adr),
-		.adr = rt711_0_adr,
+		.adr_d = rt711_0_adr,
  	},
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(1),
  		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_1_adr),
-		.adr = rt1308_1_adr,
+		.adr_d = rt1308_1_adr,
  	},
  	{
  		.mask = BIT(3),
  		.num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt715_3_adr),
-		.adr = rt715_3_adr,
+		.adr_d = rt715_3_adr,
  	},
  	{}
  };

(...)



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux