On 2020-03-09 12:38, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:48:39PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
There's been a couple of accidental regressions already on stable, now
fixed, and my understanding is that the bar for inclusion is higher, so
let's assume this counts as a new feature: it never worked before with an
There's been no change in the requirements for stable, those regressions
have come from patches that have been pulled in automatically by the bot
Sasha runs which doesn't pay attention to the requirements but tries to
identify patches automatically.
Mark, what's your take on backporting these to 4.19 LTS? Do we abandon
the subject and "just" merge (once reviewed/ approved) into 5.5? I
believe addressing all the issues mentioned on 4.19 is important.
