Hi Ranjani Thank you for your review > > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > > index 3686dda097e2..d578dbdfa846 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > > @@ -2978,14 +2978,11 @@ int soc_dpcm_runtime_update(struct > > snd_soc_card *card) > > return ret; > > } > > > > -static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) > > +static void dpcm_fe_dai_clean(struct snd_pcm_substream > > *fe_substream) > The series looks good to me, Morimoto-san. But a minor suggestion if > you're doing a v2 to address other comments. Could you please change > the name of the function above to dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup() instead? Yeah, will do. Thanks > Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
