From: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
It seems to be a typo. It makes more sense to return the return value
of sdw_update() instead of the value we want to update.
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
index 13887713f311..b8a7a84aca1c 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int sdw_initialize_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave)
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(slave->bus->dev,
"SDW_DP0_INTMASK read failed:%d\n", ret);
- return val;
+ return ret;
}
return 0;
--
2.20.1
