On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:09:59AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > 1) We could update the machine drivers to do an imply as well, > like the changes to SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS. I think this will > generally work but doesn't really feel right as you can end up with > the machine driver built without the CODEC. Yes, that's not helpful. > 2) We could update the machine drivers to a depends on and make > the CODEC symbols manually selectable. I guess this also has the > advantages that it would be necessary for the simple card stuff > that seems to be everyones first choice for machine drivers these > days. That's not good, it means people have to know exactly what CODECs and DAIs are on their board to even see the config option. > Mark do you have any strong feelings on this I am leaning towards > 2? Why not just continue adding the relevant dependencies to the machine drivers like we've always done?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
