On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:13:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:32:19PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > >... > > There's another issue I want to raise concerning bugzilla. We have the > > classic case of "not enough people reading bugzilla bugs" - which is one > > of the biggest problems with bugzilla. Virtually no one in the ARM > > community looks for ARM bugs in bugzilla. > > > > Let's not forget that it would be a waste of time for people to manually > > check bugzilla for ARM bugs. There's soo few people reporting ARM bugs > > into bugzilla that a weekly manual check by every maintainer would just > > return the same old boring results for months and months at a time. > >... > > What about having all ARM bugs in Bugzilla by default assigned to > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? [1] That would also work, probably much better than setting up yet another list. My experience of trying to get mbligh to do this when I stopped looking after PCMCIA stuff was *extremely* painful. Wonder if it's become any easier of late? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
