On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 05:34:40PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > My preference in terms of integration in drivers/soundwire would be > > 1. Intel DAI cleanup (only one kfree missing, will resubmit v3 today) > > 2. [PATCH 00/10] soundwire: bus: fix race conditions, add suspend-resume > this series solves a lot of issues and should go first. > > 3. ASoC/SOF integration (still with platform devices) > I narrowed this down to 6 patches, that would help me submit the rest of the > ASoC/SOF patches in Mark Brown's tree. That would be Intel specific. This > step would be the first where everything SoundWire-related can be enabled in > a build, and while we've caught a lot of cross-compilation issues it's > likely some bots will find corner cases to keep us busy. > > 4. master_device/driver transition: these updated patches removing platform > devices + sysfs support + Qualcomm support (the last point would depend on > the workload/support of Qualcomm/Linaro folks, I don't want to commit on > their behalf). > > 5. New SoundWire functionality for Intel platforms (clock-stop/restart and > synchronized links). The code would be only located in drivers/soundwire and > be easier to handle. For the synchronized links we still have a bit of > validation work to do so it should really come last. > > Would this work for everyone? Sounds reasonable to me, but patches would show it best to see if there are any issues :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
