Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: tlv320adcx140: Add the tlv320adcx140 codec driver family

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:45:33PM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:

> +	/* interface format */
> +	switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_FORMAT_MASK) {
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S:
> +		iface_reg1 |= ADCX140_I2S_MODE_BIT;
> +		break;
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_LEFT_J:
> +		iface_reg1 |= ADCX140_LEFT_JUST_BIT;
> +		break;
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_DSP_A:
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_DSP_B:
> +		break;

_DSP_A and _DSP_B are two different format so I'd expect the device to
be configured differently for them, or for only one to be supported.

> +static int adcx140_mute(struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai, int mute)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_component *component = codec_dai->component;
> +	int config_reg;
> +	int mic_enable;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* There is not a single register to mute.  Each enabled path has to be
> +	 * muted individually.  Read which path is enabled and mute it.
> +	 */
> +	snd_soc_component_read(component, ADCX140_IN_CH_EN, &mic_enable);
> +	if (!mic_enable)
> +		return 0;

You could also just offer this control to userspace, it's not
*essential* to have this operation though it can help with glitching
during stream startup.

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ADCX140_MAX_CHANNELS; i++) {
> +		config_reg = ADCX140_CH8_CFG2 - (5 * i);
> +		if (!(mic_enable & BIT(i)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (mute)
> +			snd_soc_component_write(component, config_reg, 0);
> +	}

How does the unmute work?

> +	internal_reg = device_property_present(adcx140->dev,
> +					       "ti,use-internal-areg");
> +
> +	if (internal_reg)
> +		sleep_cfg_val |= ADCX140_AREG_INTERNAL;

Does this actually need a specific property or could you support the
regulator API and then use regulator_get_optional() to figure out if an
external AVDD is attached?

> +static int adcx140_codec_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
> +{
> +	struct adcx140_priv *adcx140 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
> +
> +	return adc5410_init(adcx140);
> +}

Does the separate init function buy us anything?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux