On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:04:06AM -0800, Sridharan, Ranjani wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Can I please bother you with you quick question about the right license to > use for the > debug.c file in the SOF directory? What is "SOF"? > Currently, it is dual licensed with GPLv2.0 and BSD. But Pierre brought up > a concern about this conflicting with all the exports in the file being > GPLv2.0. Should this be fixed to change the license to GPLv2.0 only? > Appreciate your help in this regard. Why ask a developer a legal question, don't you all have a whole huge legal department who knows all of this type of thing really really well? Would you ask a programmer a medical question? That being said, think about trying to justify the existance of a BSD licensed file trying to access gpl-only symbols, why in the world would this even be a question? Why have it dual licensed at all when I was told that Intel was NOT going to do this anymore for any kernel code? bah, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
