Hi,
On 26-01-2020 02:38, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.4.14, v4.19.98, v4.14.167, v4.9.211, v4.4.211.
v5.4.14: Build OK!
v4.19.98: Build OK!
v4.14.167: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
38d9c12c0a6d ("ALSA: hda: Add Gigabyte P55A-UD3 and Z87-D3HP to the power_save blacklist")
5cb6b5fc013e ("ALSA: hda: Add 2 more models to the power_save blacklist")
b529ef2464ad ("ALSA: hda: Add Clevo W35xSS_370SS to the power_save blacklist")
dd6dd5365404 ("ALSA: hda: Add Intel NUC7i3BNB to the power_save blacklist")
f91f1806530d ("ALSA: hda: Add Intel NUC5i7RY to the power_save blacklist")
v4.9.211: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
38d9c12c0a6d ("ALSA: hda: Add Gigabyte P55A-UD3 and Z87-D3HP to the power_save blacklist")
5cb6b5fc013e ("ALSA: hda: Add 2 more models to the power_save blacklist")
b529ef2464ad ("ALSA: hda: Add Clevo W35xSS_370SS to the power_save blacklist")
dd6dd5365404 ("ALSA: hda: Add Intel NUC7i3BNB to the power_save blacklist")
f91f1806530d ("ALSA: hda: Add Intel NUC5i7RY to the power_save blacklist")
v4.4.211: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
38d9c12c0a6d ("ALSA: hda: Add Gigabyte P55A-UD3 and Z87-D3HP to the power_save blacklist")
5cb6b5fc013e ("ALSA: hda: Add 2 more models to the power_save blacklist")
b529ef2464ad ("ALSA: hda: Add Clevo W35xSS_370SS to the power_save blacklist")
dd6dd5365404 ("ALSA: hda: Add Intel NUC7i3BNB to the power_save blacklist")
f91f1806530d ("ALSA: hda: Add Intel NUC5i7RY to the power_save blacklist")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
Just adding it to 4.19.98 and 5.4 (and 5.5) is fine.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
