Hi Takashi-san > Actually as Lars pointed out in another reply, the current code of > soc_pcm_init_runtime_hw() is correct. It's a bit tricky but smartly > handling the cases: when rate_min/max are to be overridden by rates > bits, they are supposed to be zero, and min_not_zero() does the > trick. Also, snd_pcm_rate_mask_intersect() sanitizes the bits when > CONTINUOUS or KNOT is set, so the spurious rate bits won't be > reflected in snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(), too. > > But still the dpcm_fe_dai_startup() needs to be fixed as you > mentioned. Though, I guess we need to fix not there but rather other > places (e.g. dpcm_set_fe_runtime() itself). Ahh, Yes of course. Fixup dpcm_set_fe_runtime() is included in my previous "We need to fixup dpcm_fe_dai_startup()" :) Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
