Hi. James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > Are any steps being taken to change the design so that sample rate > conversion works better? Yes, you've seen it, its in my patch. :) Seriously though, I think that attitude is unfair. I dare to claim that it was not some random hack that just happened to work. But rather a correct and reliable fix. > 2) allow the user application to use different buffer/period sizes than > the hardware itself. That's what the rate plugin already allows, it seems. > 3) Try to encourage applications not to use the pcm_rate plugin at > all!!! Instead force each application to do its own sample rate > conversion to match what the hardware can do. The applications have nothing to do with that plugin I think - it all in an alsa config. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
