On 12/27/19 1:00 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 17-12-19, 15:03, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:Align with previous renames and shorten macro No functionality change Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c | 9 ++++----- include/linux/soundwire/sdw_type.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c index c0585bcc8a41..2b2830b622fa 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ sdw_get_device_id(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_driver *drv) static int sdw_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *ddrv) { struct sdw_slave *slave = to_sdw_slave_device(dev); - struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv); + struct sdw_driver *drv = to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv);so patch 1 does: - struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_driver(dev->driver); + struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(dev->driver); and here we move drv_to_sdw_slave_driver to to_sdw_slave_driver... why not do this in first patch and save step1... or did i miss something??
because patch1 introduces replaces 'sdw_' by 'sdw_slave_' in several places, not just for drv_to_sdw_driver()
I can squash all these patches if you want to but then you'll tell me one step at a time...
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
