On 12/17/19 6:13 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 01:41:09PM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
I noticed that soc_compr_free_fe(), dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown() are directly
calling SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_STOP without caring pmdown time / delayed work.
Can we use snd_soc_dapm_stream_stop() for these, too ?
That does seem like an oversight...
What would the rationale for deferring a FE shutdown though?
IIRC in the Intel machine drivers we only use .pm_ignore_downtime to
backends to keep some clocks on, and even that is questionable (the
clock dependencies should be properly modeled instead of hidden with an
obscure dailink setting). When I asked why exactly this flag was set in
most cases the reason why 'because others did so in the past'...
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
