From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 5cca59516de5df9de6bdecb328dd55fb5bcccb41 ] This reverts commit 957ce0c6b8a1f (ASoC: soc-pcm: check symmetry after hw_params). That commit cause soc_pcm_params_symmetry can't take effect. cpu_dai->rate, cpu_dai->channels and cpu_dai->sample_bits are updated in the middle of soc_pcm_hw_params, so move soc_pcm_params_symmetry to the end of soc_pcm_hw_params is not a good solution, for judgement of symmetry in the function is always true. FIXME: According to the comments of that commit, I think the case described in the commit should disable symmetric_rates in Back-End, rather than changing the position of soc_pcm_params_symmetry. Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1573555602-5403-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index cdce96a3051bf..a6e96cf1d8ff9 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -877,6 +877,11 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int i, ret = 0; mutex_lock_nested(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex, rtd->card->pcm_subclass); + + ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params); + if (ret) + goto out; + if (rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params) { ret = rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params(substream, params); if (ret < 0) { @@ -958,9 +963,6 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, } component = NULL; - ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params); - if (ret) - goto component_err; out: mutex_unlock(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex); return ret; -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
