On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:24 AM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:52:09PM +0800, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> > The driver forgets to call regulator_bulk_disable() in remove like that
> > in probe failure.
> > Besides, some failed branches in probe do not handle failure correctly.
> > Add the missed call and revise wrong direct returns to fix it.
>
> Same issue with runtime PM here.
>
> Also please submit one patch per change, each with a clear changelog, as
> covered in SubmittingPatches. This makes it much easier to review
> things since it's easier to tell if the patch does what it was intended
> to do. When splitting patches up git gui can be helpful, you can stage
> and unstage individual lines by right clicking on them.
I'm sorry that I didn't notice this problem and these patches should be merged
into a series.
I have a question that what if CONFIG_PM is not defined?
Since I have met runtime PM before in the patch
a31eda65ba21 ("net: fec: fix clock count mis-match").
I learned there that in some cases CONFIG_PM is not defined so runtime PM
cannot take effect.
Therefore, undo operations should still exist in remove functions.
Regards,
Chuhong
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
