Hi Geert, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:58:34PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > There is no need to store the inverted DALIGN values in the table, as > they can easily be calculated at run-time. This also protects against > the introduction of inconsistencies between normal and inverted values > by a future table modification. > > Reorder the two subexpressions in the AND check, to perform the least > expensive check first. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Compile-tested only. > > Interestingly, this decreases code size on arm64, but increases on arm32 > (both gcc version 7.4.0 (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)). > > arm32: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 16186 276 84 16546 40a2 sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o.orig > 16194 276 84 16554 40aa sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o > > arm64: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 17426 392 104 17922 4602 sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o.orig > 17414 392 104 17910 45f6 sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o > --- > sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------ jFTR, using ARM's aarch64 gcc-8.3-2019.03 and v5.4-10271-g596cf45cbf6e: $ size sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o.before sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o.after text data bss dec hex filename 21433 380 88 21901 558d sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o.before 21505 380 88 21973 55d5 sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.o.after > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c > index 399dc6e9bde5b042..d20f03dfdee66643 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c > +++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/core.c > @@ -376,20 +376,15 @@ u32 rsnd_get_adinr_bit(struct rsnd_mod *mod, struct rsnd_dai_stream *io) > */ > u32 rsnd_get_dalign(struct rsnd_mod *mod, struct rsnd_dai_stream *io) > { > - static const u32 dalign_values[8][2] = { > - {0x76543210, 0x67452301}, > - {0x00000032, 0x00000023}, > - {0x00007654, 0x00006745}, > - {0x00000076, 0x00000067}, > - {0xfedcba98, 0xefcdab89}, > - {0x000000ba, 0x000000ab}, > - {0x0000fedc, 0x0000efcd}, > - {0x000000fe, 0x000000ef}, > + static const u32 dalign_values[8] = { > + 0x76543210, 0x00000032, 0x00007654, 0x00000076, > + 0xfedcba98, 0x000000ba, 0x0000fedc, 0x000000fe, FWIW, using below test procedure, I can reconstruct the original two-dimensional dalign_values[8][2] array on the host: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdint.h> typedef uint32_t u32; void main(void) { u32 dalign, i; static const u32 dalign_values[8] = { 0x76543210, 0x00000032, 0x00007654, 0x00000076, 0xfedcba98, 0x000000ba, 0x0000fedc, 0x000000fe, }; for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { u32 keep = dalign = dalign_values[i]; dalign = (dalign & 0xf0f0f0f0) >> 4 | (dalign & 0x0f0f0f0f) << 4; printf("{0x%08x, 0x%08x},\n", keep, dalign); } } -- Best Regards, Eugeniu _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel