> > > > > OK, that makes sense. Thanks for the suggestion. > > Regarding your previous comment about adding flush_work() to the > sync_stop() > > op, would that still be required? > > Yes, that's needed no matter which way is used; the pending work must > be synced at some point. > Thanks, Takashi. I will follow up with the suggested SOF changes after your patches have been applied. Thanks, Ranjani _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
