On 09/18/2007 09:28 AM, Krzysztof Helt wrote: >> Moreover, we aren't under lock at all in the cs4231 version (which also >> means that msleep(1) thing is in fact fine there). Can't we do that for >> ad1848 as well? >> > > The lock is right thing to do as Trent found out. The in() call writes > to register. On the SMP setup it may backfire (cs4231 does not have > locks but sparc cs4231 has them). Yep, cs4231 is broken. Trent's new ad1848 version is the reference now it seems. I'll fix up cs4231 if he doesn't beat me to it -- I'm still messing with the Aztech cards so am testing cs4231 continously anyway... Rene. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
