On 09/11/2007 01:17 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> Actually, the code with msleep() was basically OK. If more finer >> check is needed, it can simply use msleep(1). The point is to use >> timer_after_eq() instead of loop count for the precise timeouts. > > Could you check whether the below patch works? Works for me on ISA CS4231 (behind an AZT1605). Earlier Krzysztof suggested that 2 ms may be optimum, but I'll leave that upto him. Acked-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx> Zzz, Rene _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
